Allegations of irregular payments around a 1.2bn property auction by Irelands bad bank to a top investment fund are being probed by US authorities.
The Department of Justice is in the early stages of scrutinising the deal, according to people familiar with the situation, and has sent a subpoena for information to Cerberus, the $25bn New York investment firm that won the 2014 auction dubbed Project Eagle.
On this topicIN Property
The move by the DoJ adds a transatlantic dimension to a matter that has already sparked political scrutiny both in the Irish Republic and Northern Ireland, as well as a criminal investigation by the UKs National Crime Agency.
The probes were launched following allegations this summer that one of the biggest auctions by Irelands National Asset Management Agency, known as Nama, comprising an 850-strong portfolio of property in Northern Ireland, was tainted by a 7m payment intended for a Northern Irish politician.
Cerberus instructed Brown Rudnick, the US law firm, on the deal, which in turn used a local solicitors firm called Tughans. It was the departure of Tughans senior partner, Ian Coulter, who advised on the auction, that first sparked a report to the solicitors watchdog.
Mick Wallace, an independent politician in the Irish Republic, then alleged in parliament in July that an audit of Tughans had revealed a 7m payment earmarked for a Northern Ireland politician.
Cerberus has denied wrongdoing and making any improper payments.
In a statement to the FT, it said: Cerberus has not been accused of any wrongdoing and has welcomed any inquiry associated with the acquisition of the Project Eagle portfolio. As best we know, these matters are related to the alleged conduct of third parties and not to Cerberus or any of its affiliates.
In July Cerberus said it never paid Tughans, which was instructed directly by Brown Rudnick.
Brown Rudnick said in July it had engaged Tughans as local counsel in [the] transaction and agreed to share with Tughans our fee from Cerberus and this arrangement was disclosed to both Cerberus and Nama.
The DoJ and Nama declined to comment. In July Nama said it sought and received confirmation from Cerberus that no fee was payable by Cerberus to any person connected with Nama in relation to any aspect of the Project Eagle sales process and that it was confident the deal delivered the best possible return that could have been achieved for Irish taxpayers.
The DoJs interest comes as one of Northern Irelands leading businessmen told a committee hearing on Thursday that Cerberus was ruthless, unjust and unreasonable in its handling of the transaction.
Gareth Graham a property investor whose loans were acquired by Nama after Irelands spectacular property bust, and were included in the portfolio sold to Cerberus launched an extraordinary attack on the way Project Eagle was handled. He also heavily criticised Frank Cushnahan, an adviser to Nama in connection with its Northern Irish assets between 2010 and 2013.
Mr Graham claimed before a committee hearing at Stormont, Northern Irelands devolved parliament in Belfast, that Mr Cushnahan had a malevolent influence on the transaction and in particular in the way Mr Grahams loans were included in the sale.
Mr Graham and Mr Cushnahan were once close associates but their business relationship broke down in 2008. Mr Cushnahan could not be contacted for comment. However he previously issued a statement strongly denying he had done anything wrong in relation to Project Eagle.
Daithi McKay, chair of the Stormont finance committee, said Mr Grahams allegations were extraordinary and raised huge questions about the integrity of the sale of Namas northern property portfolio. He said: What we have here is the makings of a huge scandal surrounding the biggest property deal in the norths history.
Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2015. You may share using our article tools.
Please don't cut articles from FT.com and redistribute by email or post to the web.